Resolution of the Supreme Court, dated July 07, 2022, case No. 910/1801/21. Available at https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105178962 The Supreme Court upheld the judgement of the court of first instance …and ascertained: The plaintiff (an individual entrepreneur) submitted to the Kyiv City Commercial Court an action against the defendant (an individual entrepreneur) in order to recover UAH 250…
Category: Internet & Social Media
A Ukrainian court approach against online advocating overthrow of government and constitutional order. Think twice before you dare to like or share
Sentence of the Romny Interdistrict Court of the Sumy Region, dated December 29, 2021, case No. 585/208/21. Available at https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102290545 The pre-trial investigation found that the defendant, being an experienced user of the social network Odnoklassniki.Ru , having antipathy towards Ukrainian authorities … had used the personal account created by him on the social network Odnoklassniki.Ru…
Harmful speech. Limitation of the freedom of offline and online speech in Ukraine
Resolution of the Supreme Court, dated May 20, 2019, case No. 591/7099/16-ц. Available at https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82119183 The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals ruled that the question of the defendant “Are you stupid?” was not false information and a value judgment, but it was a subjective opinion of…
Identity theft; virtual property theft
Sentence of the Rivne City Court of the Rivne Region, dated September 13, 2019, case No. 569/12334/19. Available at http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84251500 The Court… found: On July 25, 2018, the exact time was not ascertained by the pre-trial investigation, the accused person being at his place of residence [the address is hidden], for the purpose of unauthorized interference…
Legal remedies: theory and real life
Resolutions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, dated May 21, 2012, case Nos. 6-18цс11, 6-69цс11, 6-20цс11. Available at http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/24976430, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/24976440, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/24704776 In addition, the court did not take into account that limitation of ways to protect civil rights or interests shall be applied in compliance with the provisions of Articles 55, 124 of the Constitution…
Bonum Aequum Ars Jus 